{"result":{"code":"AKE","name":"LD3","slug":"ake-ld3","category":"container","deck_position":"lower","external_dimensions":{"length":156,"width":153,"height":163},"internal_dimensions":{"length":150,"width":147,"height":155},"internal_dimensions_basis":"unverified","door_dimensions":{"width":147,"height":152},"max_gross_weight":1588,"max_gross_weight_basis":"structural-mgw-manufacturer","max_gross_weight_basis_qualifier":"Jettainer (pool operator) publishes 'Max. gross weight 1.588 kg | 3,500 lbs' with no aircraft or deck qualifier; AirBridgeCargo prints 1,588 kg. ANA Cargo's 1,587 sits under the column 'Weight Lim Inc ULD Tare Wt' scoped to B747/B777/B767 and is therefore the operational figure, not the structural rating.","deck_limits":[],"tare_weight":82,"tare_weight_basis":"unverified","tare_basis_qualifier":"Served 82 kg is matched only by AirBridgeCargo, whose AKE prose and 'AS1825 volume' label appear to be the same boilerplate that aclairshop.com (a reseller already cited on this record) publishes — so it is not treated as independent. ANA Cargo publishes 90-100 kg for the standard AKE and 71 kg for the LIGHT WEIGHT TYPE; IAG Cargo publishes 74 kg. Observed band across carriers 71-100 kg, spanning documented build variants.","usable_volume":4.3,"capacity_basis":"carrier-published","max_build_up_height_cm":null,"max_build_up_height_deck":null,"compatible_aircraft":["B777","A330","B747","A380","B787"],"notes":"Most common lower-deck container worldwide. Contoured to fit narrow-body and wide-body lower holds. Rectangular base 156×153 cm; contour broadens at top to ~200 cm (ACL Airshop reports the contour-top width, hence its '200.7 cm' figure for the same container). MGW 1588 kg (Unilode, ACL, AviusULD, DSV 1587 within tolerance).","provenance":{"status":"pending","sources":[{"url":"https://www.unilode.com/uld-specification/","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:08:13.920Z","source_class":"primary-fetchable","verdict":"CONFIRMED","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:08:13.920Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions","usableVolume","maxGrossWeight"],"fields_not_on_page":["tareWeight"]},{"url":"https://www.cargolux.com/fleet-equipment/ulds/","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:30:53.855Z","source_class":"primary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:30:53.855Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions","usableVolume"],"mismatch_detail":"internal: 150x147x155cm vs \"1460x1432x1524\" mm; tare: 82 vs \"100\"; MGW: 1588 vs \"1587 M/D\""},{"url":"https://www.aclairshop.com/container_specs.php","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:31:41.835Z","source_class":"tertiary","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:31:41.835Z","fields_confirmed":["maxGrossWeight","usableVolume"],"mismatch_detail":"ext: L156/W153/H163 vs \"1,534 (60.4) x 2,007 (79) x 1,626 (64)\" mm (contour-top axis)"},{"url":"https://www.dsv.com/en/our-solutions/modes-of-transport/air-freight/unit-load-devices/ld3-ake-ave-container","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:13:02.903Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:13:02.903Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions","tareWeight"],"mismatch_detail":"MGW: 1588 vs \"1,587 kg\""},{"url":"https://www.aviusuld.com/products/ake/","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:14:13.924Z","source_class":"tertiary","verdict":"CONFIRMED","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:14:13.924Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions","maxGrossWeight","usableVolume"],"fields_not_on_page":["tareWeight","internalDimensions"]},{"url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_load_device","accessed_at":"2026-08-03T09:19:03.806Z","source_class":"tertiary","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-03T09:19:03.806Z","fields_confirmed":["identity"],"mismatch_detail":"vol: 4.3 vs \"4.5 (159)\" (LD3 row)"},{"url":"https://www.anacargo.jp/en/int/specification/pdf/container.pdf","accessed_at":"2026-08-04T04:36:04.978Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-04T04:36:04.978Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions"],"mismatch_detail":"maxGrossWeight: served 1588 vs page '1,587kg'; usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.4'/'4.0' (variant-dependent)"},{"url":"https://www.anacargo.jp/en/int/specification/cm_container.html","accessed_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:18.576Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:18.576Z","fields_confirmed":["externalDimensions"],"fields_not_on_page":["internalDimensions"],"mismatch_detail":"maxGrossWeight: served 1588 vs page '1,587'; usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.4'"},{"url":"https://www.airbridgecargo.com/en/page/70/loading-devices","accessed_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:43.517Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:43.517Z","fields_confirmed":["maxGrossWeight","tareWeight"],"fields_not_on_page":["externalDimensions","internalDimensions"],"mismatch_detail":"usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page 'AS1825 volume: 4.5 m3'"},{"url":"https://www.jettainer.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Misc/Show_flyer_Final_englisch_01.pdf","accessed_at":"2026-08-04T04:36:29.488Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-04T04:36:29.488Z","fields_confirmed":["maxGrossWeight"],"fields_not_on_page":["internalDimensions","tareWeight","usableVolume"],"mismatch_detail":"externalDimensions: served 156x153x163 cm vs page '200x153x162cm' — probable source-data error, resembles RKN's footprint"},{"url":"https://www.iagcargo.com/en/fleet/ulds/","accessed_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:57.566Z","source_class":"secondary-fetchable","verdict":"MISMATCH","verdict_at":"2026-08-04T04:33:57.566Z","fields_confirmed":["tareWeight"],"fields_not_on_page":["externalDimensions","internalDimensions","maxGrossWeight"],"mismatch_detail":"usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.2 cubic m'"}],"audited_at":"2026-05-12","chrome_verified_at":"2026-08-03","soap_signoff_at":null,"field_confirmations":{"external_dimensions":["unilode.com","aviusuld.com"],"internal_dimensions":[],"max_gross_weight":["unilode.com","aviusuld.com"],"tare_weight":[],"usable_volume":["unilode.com","aviusuld.com"]},"tier_bar_outcome":"PENDING — field bar unmet on 5 field(s) — externalDimensions: one credited source, need an independent corroborator | internalDimensions: no source carries read-evidence (CONFIRMED + stamped accessed_at + basis matched) | maxGrossWeight: one credited source, need an independent corroborator | tareWeight: no source carries read-evidence (CONFIRMED + stamped accessed_at + basis matched) | usableVolume: one credited source, need an independent corroborator","notes":"6 authoritative sources hit. Base dims 156×153 cm and height 163 cm agree across Unilode/Cargolux/DSV/AviusULD/Wikipedia within ±2 cm. MGW 1588 kg (Unilode/AviusULD) and 1587 kg (Cargolux/DSV) agree within ±100 kg. Tare 82 kg (DSV) within published range 82–100 kg (Cargolux 100, AviusULD not listed). Volume 4.3 m³ (Unilode, AviusULD, Cargolux, DSV all agree).","decision_rationale":"Rule 1 (rounding noise). 6 of 6 authoritative sources concur within tolerance on dims, MGW, tare, and volume. Most-published values taken as headline. No genuine contradictions to resolve. [2026-07-26 ULD lane] provenance.status \"verified\" -> \"pending\". The dataset claimed verified on all 16 records while chromeVerifiedAt and soapSignoffAt were null on all 16 — the second agent in the documented two-agent model had never run — and the sources array was bare strings with NO SLOT for accessed_at, so the dataset was structurally incapable of recording the timestamp its own \"verified\" bar requires. sources is now [{url, accessed_at}]. Every one of this record's 6 cited URLs was HEAD-checked on 2026-07-26 and ALL RESOLVED (dataset-wide: 29/29 distinct URLs, 100%), so this is NOT link rot — the citations are live. What is still missing is a content read: accessed_at stays null because a liveness probe proves a URL answers, not that the page still says what was transcribed from it. Per the project's own rule (multi-source-complete requires accessed_at populated on all records), the honest status is pending, not verified. [2026-08-03 Chrome layer-2 ingest] The second agent ran for the first time; 6 cited source(s) were read and each carries a verdict. 2 CONFIRMED (1 non-tertiary), 4 MISMATCH. Tier bar: bar NOT met — only 1 non-tertiary confirmation(s), need 2. NO non-tertiary source confirms: internalDimensions, tareWeight. Those values remain as transcribed and are NOT evidenced by this run. Disagreements recorded verbatim on each source as mismatchDetail. NO SERVED VALUE WAS CHANGED in this pass: every disagreement is either (a) rounding within the documented tolerance, (b) an axis/row-convention difference already explained in this record's notes, or (c) a genuine contradiction whose resolution needs a source this run could not settle. Changing a figure on a single contested read is the \"plausible reconstruction\" this dataset already refused once on UN/LOCODE, and the record stays pending so nothing is over-claimed. [2026-08-03 lane 4 — basis layer] maxGrossWeight and tareWeight now state WHAT KIND of quantity they are, because the numbers were mislabelled before they were wrong. maxGrossWeightBasis = structural-mgw-manufacturer. Jettainer (pool operator) publishes 'Max. gross weight 1.588 kg | 3,500 lbs' with no aircraft or deck qualifier; AirBridgeCargo prints 1,588 kg. ANA Cargo's 1,587 sits under the column 'Weight Lim Inc ULD Tare Wt' scoped to B747/B777/B767 and is therefore the operational figure, not the structural rating. tareWeightBasis = unverified. Served 82 kg is matched only by AirBridgeCargo, whose AKE prose and 'AS1825 volume' label appear to be the same boilerplate that aclairshop.com (a reseller already cited on this record) publishes — so it is not treated as independent. ANA Cargo publishes 90-100 kg for the standard AKE and 71 kg for the LIGHT WEIGHT TYPE; IAG Cargo publishes 74 kg. Observed band across carriers 71-100 kg, spanning documented build variants. deckLimits is empty: no fetched source published a deck-split table for this record. Back-filling it by inference is the failure this lane exists to prevent. NO SERVED VALUE CHANGED on this record. Variant-record split for deck limits was considered and REJECTED: REJECTED for deck limits. Splitting PAG into PAG-main / PAG-lower would fabricate IATA codes that appear on no air waybill and in no source, and would break lookup by code. The deck/aircraft dependency is expressed as a BASIS plus a sparse deckLimits array, not as new records. (Skill rule 2 governs documented industry variants such as PMC vs PMC-Q7, which DO have distinct published identities; a deck is not such a variant.) [2026-08-04 lane 4C — Chrome delta] The second agent read 5 of this record's delta citation(s). 0 CONFIRMED, 5 MISMATCH, 0 BASIS-MISMATCH, 0 NOT-ON-PAGE. MISMATCH anacargo.jp: maxGrossWeight: served 1588 vs page '1,587kg'; usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.4'/'4.0' (variant-dependent). MISMATCH anacargo.jp: maxGrossWeight: served 1588 vs page '1,587'; usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.4'. MISMATCH airbridgecargo.com: usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page 'AS1825 volume: 4.5 m3'. MISMATCH jettainer.com: externalDimensions: served 156x153x163 cm vs page '200x153x162cm' — probable source-data error, resembles RKN's footprint. MISMATCH iagcargo.com: usableVolume: served 4.3 vs page '4.2 cubic m'. NO SERVED VALUE CHANGED on this record in this pass. [carried-forward disagreements] Recorded by earlier passes and named here because W1b requires every non-CONFIRMED verdict to appear in prose: MISMATCH cargolux.com — internal: 150x147x155cm vs \"1460x1432x1524\" mm; tare: 82 vs \"100\"; MGW: 1588 vs \"1587 M/D\"; MISMATCH dsv.com — MGW: 1588 vs \"1,587 kg\"; MISMATCH en.wikipedia.org — vol: 4.3 vs \"4.5 (159)\" (LD3 row)."}},"meta":{"source":"IATA ULD Technical Manual + carrier-published specifications (per-entry provenance; ≥4 cited sources per record; second-agent coverage COMPLETE — every one of the 122 cited pairings has been opened and verdicted, and 145 of 148 citations carry a timestamped read while 3 were never opened; corroboration is counted by publisher rather than by URL, so those 148 citations resolve to 125 distinct sources. Coverage is not agreement: all 16 records remain pending).","total":16,"last_audited":"2026-05-12"},"_source":{"type":"reference","authority":"IATA ULD Technical Manual + carrier-published specifications","provenance_status":"pending-verification"}}